The Technology Powering Document Review’s Evolution

Part 4: Practical Implementation Guide for Legal Organizations

Throughout this series, we’ve explored how document review is evolving from a cost center to a strategic advantage, examined the technologies enabling this transformation, and shared real-world frameworks for different types of legal organizations. Now, as Legal Week 2025 approaches, we’re providing a practical roadmap to help you begin your own document review transformation journey.

Whether you’re just starting to reconsider your approach or are already partway through your transformation, this guide will help you assess your current state, define your goals, and implement changes that deliver meaningful results.

Assessing Your Current State: The Document Review Maturity Model

Before mapping out your transformation journey, it’s essential to understand your starting point. We’ve developed a Document Review Maturity Model that helps organizations assess their current capabilities across five key dimensions:

1. Staffing Approach

Level 1: Reactive	Level 2: Managed	Level 3: Proactive	Level 4: Strategic
Ad hoc staffing requests Multiple agencies with little consistency No preferred reviewer pool  Significant deployment delays	Standardized staffing processes  Preferred agency relationships  Basic reviewer performance tracking  Reduced deployment time	Direct access to reviewer pools  Performance-based selection  Consistent teams across matters  Rapid deployment capability	Proprietary reviewer database  Direct reviewer relationships  Predictive staffing for anticipated needs  Specialized teams by matter type

“We were firmly at Level 1 two years ago,” recalls the litigation support director at a midsize firm. “Every new matter meant starting from scratch with staffing. Today, we’re solidly at Level 3, with a consistent pool of reviewers we can deploy within hours rather than days.”

2. Technology Integration

Level 1: Reactive	Level 2: Managed	Level 3: Proactive	Level 4: Strategic
Minimal technology beyond review platform  Manual processes for most tasks  Limited performance tracking  Disconnected systems	Basic integration between systems  Semi-automated administrative processes  Standard performance reports  Some workflow automation	Comprehensive integration across platforms  Automated workflows and processes  Real-time dashboards and alerts  Performance analytics	AI-enhanced process optimization  Predictive analytics and forecasting  Self-improving workflows  Strategic technology roadmap

3. Quality Control

Level 1: Reactive	Level 2: Managed	Level 3: Proactive	Level 4: Strategic
Quality issues identified after completion  Inconsistent QC sampling  Limited feedback to reviewers  Reactive problem-solving	Systematic QC protocols  Consistent quality sampling  Standardized feedback process  Regular quality reporting	Real-time quality monitoring  Automated issue detection  Comprehensive performance metrics  Proactive intervention	AI-assisted quality control  Predictive issue identification  Quality-based team composition  Continuous improvement processes

4. Cost Management

Level 1: Reactive	Level 2: Managed	Level 3: Proactive	Level 4: Strategic
Limited visibility into cost components  High agency markups accepted as normal  Minimal budget forecasting  Reactive cost control	Transparency into cost structures  Basic cost control measures  Standard budget templates  Regular cost reporting	Reduced markup models  Performance-linked cost structures  Accurate budget forecasting  Strategic sourcing decisions	Direct access models with no markups  Performance-based staffing decisions  Strategic insourcing/outsourcing balance  Cost as competitive advantage

“Cost management was our initial focus,” explains the general counsel of a technology company. “Moving from Level 1 to Level 3 in this dimension alone resulted in a 32% reduction in our review costs while actually improving quality and speed.”

5. Knowledge Management

Level 1: Reactive	Level 2: Managed	Level 3: Proactive	Level 4: Strategic
Knowledge resides with individuals  Limited documentation  Minimal transfer between matters  Repeated learning curves	Basic knowledge documentation  Standardized protocols  Matter templates  Lessons learned process	Comprehensive knowledge systems  Systematic knowledge capture  Cross-matter insights  Specialized expertise development	Knowledge as strategic asset  AI-enhanced knowledge systems  Predictive guidance from past matters  Continuous evolution of expertise

Self-Assessment Exercise

To determine your current maturity level, consider where your organization falls in each dimension on a scale of 1-4:

1. Staffing Approach: How do you source, deploy, and manage reviewers?
2. Technology Integration: How well do your systems work together as an integrated whole?
3. Quality Control: How do you ensure consistent, high-quality review outcomes?
4. Cost Management: How effectively do you control and optimize review expenses?
5. Knowledge Management: How do you capture, share, and leverage knowledge across matters?

Then identify your target level for each dimension, recognizing that not every organization needs to reach Level 4 in every category. This assessment provides a baseline for your transformation journey and helps identify the dimensions requiring the most attention.

“We realized we didn’t need Level 4 staffing capabilities given our matter types and frequency,” notes the managing partner of a boutique litigation firm. “But we did need to reach Level 4 in quality control given our specialized practice. This insight helped us focus our investment where it mattered most.”

Defining Your Transformation Goals

Once you’ve assessed your current state, the next step is defining clear goals for your transformation. We recommend establishing specific objectives across three timeframes:

Short-Term Goals (3-6 months)

In the near term, focus on quick wins that demonstrate value and address the most pressing pain points. This might include:

• Implementing basic performance tracking for reviewers
• Establishing relationships with direct-access staffing platforms
• Documenting current review protocols and decision standards
• Creating standard templates for common matter types
• Developing clear metrics to measure improvements

The goal is to build momentum and stakeholder support while establishing baseline metrics for measuring progress.

Real-World Example: A litigation practice group implemented a performance tracking system for reviewers and established relationships with a direct-access platform. Within three months, they reduced staffing time from an average of 5 days to less than 8 hours while identifying their highest-performing reviewers for future matters.

Mid-Term Goals (6-12 months)

In the medium term, implement core technology and process changes while developing internal capabilities and expertise. This often involves:

• Establishing new staffing models and relationships
• Implementing integrated technology solutions
• Developing comprehensive quality control protocols
• Creating knowledge management systems
• Building internal expertise in review management

Many organizations see 15-20% cost reductions during this phase while simultaneously improving quality and speed.

Real-World Example: A corporate legal department implemented a direct-access platform integrated with their matter management system and created a database of preferred reviewers. By month 9, they had reduced review costs by 22% while cutting average review completion time by 35%.

Long-Term Goals (12-24 months)

Long-term goals should focus on achieving target maturity levels across all dimensions and fully integrating document review into strategic operations. This includes:

• Building proprietary databases and processes
• Implementing advanced analytics and AI capabilities
• Developing specialized teams for different matter types
• Creating competitive advantages through review capabilities
• Establishing continuous improvement processes

This is where organizations build sustainable advantages and create scalable models for future growth. The most successful transformations result in document review becoming a strategic differentiator rather than merely a cost center.

Real-World Example: An AmLaw 100 firm now features its document review capabilities prominently in client pitches, emphasizing its ability to deploy specialized teams within hours, deliver predictable costs, and maintain consistent quality across matters. They attribute winning several major clients specifically to these capabilities.

Implementation Best Practices

Across dozens of successful transformations, we’ve identified several best practices that significantly increase the likelihood of success:

1. Executive Sponsorship

Secure clear executive sponsorship from the outset. The most successful transformations have visible support from senior leadership who:

• Communicate the strategic importance of the initiative
• Remove organizational obstacles
• Allocate necessary resources
• Regularly review progress and results

Without this sponsorship, transformations often stall when they encounter institutional resistance.

“Having our managing partner as the visible champion made all the difference,” explains a litigation support manager. “When certain practice groups were reluctant to change processes, having leadership reinforce the strategic importance of the transformation helped overcome resistance.”

2. Cross-Functional Teams

Create diverse implementation teams that include representatives from all affected functions. Document review transformations impact:

• Attorneys and legal professionals
• Project managers
• Technology specialists
• Finance teams
• Client relationship managers

Including perspectives from across the organization ensures comprehensive solutions and broader buy-in.

3. Data-Driven Decisions

Base decisions on data rather than anecdotes or assumptions. Establish clear metrics from the beginning and track progress consistently. Successful transformations typically monitor:

• Cost metrics: Average cost per document, total review spend, budget accuracy
• Efficiency metrics: Documents per hour, time to deployment, time to completion
• Quality metrics: Accuracy rates, consistency scores, client satisfaction

“The data was crucial for building support,” notes an e-discovery director. “When we could show a 40% improvement in review speed with a 15% increase in accuracy and a 30% cost reduction, even the most skeptical partners became advocates.”

4. Phased Implementation

Resist the temptation to change everything at once. The most successful transformations follow a phased approach, demonstrating value at each stage before expanding further. This allows organizations to:

• Learn and adapt based on early results
• Build internal support through demonstrated wins
• Manage change at a sustainable pace
• Adjust strategies based on feedback

5. Change Management Focus

Pay as much attention to people as to technology. Document review transformation isn’t just about implementing new systems—it requires changes in:

• Behaviors and workflows
• Processes and protocols
• Organizational structures
• Incentives and measures of success

Invest in training, communication, and change management to ensure successful adoption.

“We underestimated the change management aspect initially,” admits a litigation partner. “We had great technology but struggled with adoption until we invested more heavily in training and created clearer incentives for using the new approach.”

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Based on our experience with numerous transformations, we’ve identified several common pitfalls that can derail even well-planned initiatives:

Technology-First Thinking

Many organizations make the mistake of leading with technology rather than strategy. They implement new systems without first defining their goals and processes, resulting in sophisticated technologies that don’t address their actual needs.

Avoidance Strategy: Always start with your strategic objectives and process requirements, then select technologies that support those needs.

Underestimating Change Resistance

Document review processes often have deep institutional roots and stakeholders with vested interests in the status quo. Underestimating this resistance is a common cause of stalled transformations.

Avoidance Strategy: Invest in change management from the beginning, identify potential sources of resistance early, and develop specific strategies to address concerns.

Inadequate Metrics

Without clear metrics, it’s impossible to demonstrate success or identify areas needing adjustment. Many transformations falter because they can’t clearly show the value they’re creating.

Avoidance Strategy: Establish baseline metrics before beginning and track specific KPIs throughout the transformation, adjusting your approach based on the data.

Over-Customization

Some organizations attempt to recreate every aspect of their existing processes in new systems, leading to excessive customization that increases costs and complexity while limiting flexibility.

Avoidance Strategy: Be willing to adapt processes to industry best practices rather than customizing technology to match suboptimal existing workflows.

Big Bang Approach

Attempting to transform everything simultaneously often leads to overwhelmed teams, resistance from multiple directions, and difficulty pinpointing issues when problems arise.

Avoidance Strategy: Implement changes in manageable phases, with clear success criteria for each phase before expanding further.

Next Steps: Beginning Your Transformation Journey

If you’re ready to begin your document review transformation journey, here are the concrete steps to take:

1. Complete the Self-Assessment

Use the Document Review Maturity Model to assess your organization’s current capabilities across all five dimensions. Be honest about your starting point—this baseline is essential for measuring progress.

2. Identify Your Most Critical Dimension

While all dimensions are important, most organizations have one or two areas that create the greatest pain points or opportunities. Identify which dimension, if improved, would deliver the most immediate value.

3. Set Specific Short-Term Goals

Develop 2-3 specific, measurable goals for the next 3-6 months that would demonstrate tangible progress in your critical dimension. Make these goals ambitious enough to matter but achievable enough to build momentum.

4. Secure Executive Sponsorship

Identify and engage the appropriate executive sponsor for your initiative. Present the business case focused on strategic advantages rather than just cost savings.

5. Establish Your Core Team

Create a cross-functional implementation team with representatives from all affected areas. Ensure they have appropriate time allocated to the initiative rather than treating it as an “extra” responsibility.

6. Schedule Your Legal Week Consultation

If you’re attending Legal Week 2025, let’s have a conversation! We’ll discuss your specific challenges and objectives and help you develop a tailored approach to transforming your document review operations.

The Strategic Imperative

Document review transformation isn’t just about efficiency—it’s about creating strategic advantages through speed, quality, and cost control. Organizations that successfully transform their review operations gain significant advantages in client service, matter management, and competitive positioning.

As one general counsel put it: “We used to view document review as a necessary evil—a cost to be minimized and a process to be endured. Today, it’s a strategic capability that helps us respond more effectively to legal challenges, control costs predictably, and protect the company’s interests.”

Whether you’re a global law firm seeking greater efficiency, a corporate legal department building strategic independence, or a boutique firm looking to compete above your weight class, the time to begin your transformation journey is now.

---

This is the final installment in our four-part series exploring the transformation of legal document review. Read Part 1: Transforming Your Greatest Cost Center into a Strategic Asset, Part 2: The Technology Powering Document Review’s Evolution, and Part 3: Transformation Frameworks for Different Legal Organizations.

Part 3: Strategic Approaches for Different Legal Organizations

In our previous articles, we explored how document review is evolving from a cost center to a strategic advantage and examined the integrated technologies enabling this transformation. Today, we’re turning theory into practice by sharing real-world frameworks that organizations are using to reimagine their approach to document review.

As Legal Week 2025 approaches, one thing has become increasingly clear: there is no one-size-fits-all path to document review transformation. The journey depends heavily on your organization’s structure, challenges, and strategic objectives.

Let’s explore three distinct transformation frameworks being implemented by law firms, corporate legal departments, and boutique practices—each tailored to their unique environments and goals.

The Law Firm Transformation Framework: Balancing Client Demands and Firm Profitability

Law firms face a distinct set of challenges in document review transformation. They must balance mounting client pressure for cost reduction with the need to maintain profitability, while ensuring consistent quality across diverse matter types and practice areas.

Key Challenges for Law Firms

“Our clients were increasingly pushing back on review costs while still expecting perfect quality and faster turnaround times,” explains the litigation support director at an AmLaw 50 firm. “Meanwhile, our traditional staffing models were becoming unsustainable—slow to deploy, expensive to maintain, and increasingly difficult to justify to cost-conscious clients.”

Modern law firms face multiple pressures:

• Clients demanding greater efficiency and transparency in review costs
• Unpredictable matter volume requiring rapid scaling up and down
• Quality expectations that remain high regardless of time constraints
• Growing competition from alternative legal service providers
• Pressure to maintain profitability despite fee compression

The Transformation Framework

Forward-thinking law firms are implementing a phased transformation approach that balances immediate client needs with long-term strategic objectives:

Initial Phase: Meeting Urgent Needs

The journey typically begins when a specific client matter creates urgency—perhaps a government investigation with a tight deadline or a major litigation requiring rapid scaling. This creates the opportunity to try new approaches that might otherwise face institutional resistance.

“Our transformation started with a crisis—a major client facing a second request with an impossibly tight timeline,” recalls the managing partner of a litigation practice. “We simply couldn’t staff it using our traditional methods, which forced us to explore alternatives we might have otherwise resisted.”

During this phase, firms often engage with expert-led services that provide immediate relief while introducing the firm to new technologies and approaches. This allows the firm to maintain client service while beginning to explore more efficient models.

Real-World Example: A midsize litigation firm facing a rapid-response government investigation engaged a managed review service that deployed 25 specialized reviewers within hours rather than days. The successful handling of this matter created internal champions for a broader transformation.

Intermediate Phase: Building Hybrid Capabilities

As firms gain comfort with new approaches, they often transition to hybrid models that give them greater control while maintaining support where needed. This might involve implementing platforms for direct access to pre-verified reviewers while outsourcing administrative functions like payment and coordination.

During this phase, firms develop internal expertise in review management and begin building proprietary knowledge bases. They establish performance tracking systems and create databases of preferred reviewers, increasing their independence while maintaining flexibility.

Real-World Example: Following several successful managed review projects, an AmLaw 100 firm implemented a direct-access platform that allowed them to select reviewers based on performance data from previous matters. They maintained administrative support from the platform provider while taking greater control over team composition and management.

Advanced Phase: Developing Strategic Advantage

The most sophisticated firms ultimately develop fully independent review capabilities that become strategic differentiators. They implement technologies for complete control over the review process, establish direct relationships with high-performing reviewers, and create customized workflows for different matter types.

At this stage, document review transforms from a cost center to a competitive advantage, featured prominently in pitches and business development efforts. Firms with advanced capabilities can respond more quickly to client needs, deliver more predictable costs, and maintain higher quality standards.

Real-World Example: A global law firm now highlights its proprietary document review capabilities in client pitches, emphasizing its ability to deploy specialized teams within hours, predict costs with 90%+ accuracy, and maintain consistent quality through performance analytics. These capabilities have become a key differentiator in competitive pitches.

The Impact of Law Firm Transformation

When successfully implemented, document review transformation delivers significant benefits to law firms:

Financial Impact: Document review transformation typically yields cost reductions of 25-40% compared to traditional staffing models. This allows firms to either improve profitability or pass savings on to clients, enhancing competitiveness.

Operational Efficiency: The most dramatic improvement often comes in deployment speed, with average time-to-staff reduced from several days to just hours. This operational agility is particularly valuable in time-sensitive matters like regulatory investigations or expedited discovery.

Client Satisfaction: Firms that transform their document review operations typically see significant improvements in client satisfaction scores. Clients appreciate the increased transparency, predictable costs, and faster response times that come with modernized review approaches.

“Our clients used to see document review as a necessary evil,” notes the chief practice innovation officer at a major firm. “Now they see it as a valuable service that delivers actionable insights faster and more efficiently than they thought possible.”

The Corporate Legal Department Framework: Building Strategic Independence

Corporate legal departments face different challenges than law firms, particularly around budgetary constraints, institutional knowledge management, and alignment with broader corporate objectives. Their transformation framework emphasizes building sustainable, cost-effective capabilities.

Key Challenges for Corporate Legal Departments

Corporate legal departments are increasingly under pressure to “do more with less” while managing growing data volumes and regulatory requirements. They struggle with:

• Unpredictable document review costs that routinely exceed budgets
• Difficulty maintaining institutional knowledge across matters
• Inconsistent quality from outside review providers
• Limited visibility into review progress and performance
• Pressure to demonstrate value to corporate leadership

“Every budget season, I’d promise this would be the year we’d get document review costs under control,” shares the general counsel of a multinational corporation. “And every year, we’d end up with significant overruns because we lacked the tools to manage the process effectively.”

The Transformation Framework

Corporate legal departments typically approach transformation with a focus on building long-term independence and cost predictability:

Foundation Phase: Knowledge Development

Corporate transformations often begin by focusing on knowledge capture and development of standardized processes. This might involve partnering with expert-led services for initial projects while documenting review protocols and decision trees for common issues. The department creates detailed performance metrics and builds matter templates for recurring review types.

During this phase, the focus is on learning and documentation rather than immediate cost savings. The goal is to build a foundation of institutional knowledge that will support greater independence in future phases.

Real-World Example: The legal department of a healthcare company began by creating detailed documentation of its review protocols for privacy and compliance matters. They worked with an experienced managed review provider who helped develop standardized workflows and decision trees that captured the company’s approach to common issues.

Expansion Phase: Capability Building

As knowledge and confidence grow, legal departments typically expand their capabilities through technology implementation and process standardization. They might transition to platforms offering direct reviewer selection while developing specialized teams for different types of reviews.

During this phase, departments often create knowledge management systems for review decisions and begin retaining high-performing reviewers across multiple matters. They implement performance measurement systems and develop internal expertise in review management.

Real-World Example: A financial services company implemented a direct-access platform that allowed them to build relationships with specialized reviewers familiar with banking regulations. They created a database of preferred reviewers and began tracking performance metrics across matters, gradually building a core team of consistently high-performing reviewers.

Maturity Phase: Strategic Independence

In the most advanced phase, corporate legal departments achieve true independence in their document review operations. They implement comprehensive technologies to manage their entire review process, build proprietary databases of pre-vetted reviewers, and develop specialized training for common matter types.

At this stage, document review becomes a strategic function rather than a reactive expense. The department can respond rapidly to new legal challenges, leveraging institutional knowledge and established reviewer relationships to deliver consistent, high-quality results.

Real-World Example: The legal department of a technology company now maintains its own database of specialized reviewers with subject matter expertise in areas like IP, data privacy, and antitrust. Their customized workflow system automatically routes documents to appropriate specialists, and their performance analytics identify opportunities for process improvement.

The Impact of Corporate Transformation

Successful transformation delivers significant benefits to corporate legal departments:

Budget Predictability: Perhaps the most important outcome for corporate departments is greater budget predictability. Transformed departments typically achieve 90%+ accuracy in budget forecasting compared to routine overruns in traditional models.

Knowledge Retention: Transformed departments dramatically reduce knowledge loss between matters, with some reporting 70%+ reductions in onboarding time for new matters of similar types. This institutional knowledge becomes a valuable corporate asset.

Operational Responsiveness: The ability to respond quickly to new legal challenges—regulatory inquiries, internal investigations, or emerging litigation—provides significant value to the broader organization. Advanced departments can deploy review teams in hours rather than days or weeks.

“We used to view document review as a cost to be minimized,” explains a deputy general counsel. “Now we see it as a strategic capability that helps us respond more effectively to legal challenges and protect the company’s interests.”

The Boutique Firm Framework: Competing Above Your Weight Class

Boutique law firms face perhaps the most challenging document review environment. They compete against larger firms with more resources while handling matters that can suddenly expand in scope and complexity. Their transformation framework emphasizes flexibility and scalability.

Key Challenges for Boutique Firms

Boutique firms face significant constraints in document review, including:

• Limited internal bandwidth to manage large review projects
• Inability to quickly scale for large matters
• Competitive disadvantage against larger firms
• Budget constraints that preclude traditional staffing approaches
• Need to maintain the personalized service that differentiates them

“Our challenge was clear—how could we handle document-intensive matters that would normally go to larger firms without sacrificing the quality and personal attention our clients expect?” asks the founding partner of a specialized litigation boutique.

The Transformation Framework

Boutique firms typically adopt a highly flexible approach focused on maximizing agility:

Strategic Assessment Phase

Boutique transformations often begin with a strategic assessment of the firm’s review needs across different matter types. The firm categorizes matters based on size, complexity, and strategic importance, developing different approaches for each category.

During this phase, firms identify their core competencies and the areas where they need external support. They establish partnerships with service providers who can provide scalable resources while developing standardized workflows and protocols for internal efficiency.

Real-World Example: A boutique intellectual property firm mapped out its typical matters and identified three distinct categories requiring different approaches: small portfolio reviews manageable with internal resources, mid-sized reviews requiring flexible staffing, and occasional large-scale reviews requiring full managed services.

Capability Development Phase

As boutique firms gain experience, they typically build targeted capabilities in areas most critical to their practice. They implement technologies that allow direct access to reviewers for appropriately sized matters while maintaining relationships with full-service providers for unusually large cases.

During this phase, firms develop internal expertise in review management and create a small but highly skilled core review team. They establish relationships with specialized reviewers who understand their practice areas and develop streamlined processes for routine matters.

Real-World Example: A boutique employment law firm built relationships with a core group of reviewers with employment law experience through a direct-access platform. For most matters, they managed these reviewers directly, but they maintained a relationship with a managed review provider for larger class actions.

Competitive Positioning Phase

In the advanced phase, boutique firms leverage their transformed review capabilities as a competitive differentiator. They emphasize their ability to scale quickly, deliver consistent quality, and manage costs effectively—all while providing the personalized service that is their hallmark.

At this stage, document review capabilities allow boutique firms to compete for and win matters that would previously have gone to larger firms. Their agility becomes a strategic advantage, particularly in fast-moving matters where large firm bureaucracy can be a disadvantage.

Real-World Example: A boutique firm specializing in complex commercial litigation now regularly competes for—and wins—matters against AmLaw 100 firms. In client pitches, they emphasize their ability to deploy specialized review teams within hours while providing partner-level oversight throughout the process.

The Impact of Boutique Firm Transformation

For boutique firms, successful transformation creates opportunities for significant growth:

Competitive Win Rate: Transformed boutique firms report winning competitive pitches against much larger firms, often citing their streamlined review capabilities as a deciding factor. This expands their potential client base and matter portfolio.

Matter Size Expansion: With transformed review capabilities, boutique firms can successfully handle matters of considerably larger scale than before. Some report taking on matters 5-10x larger than their previous capacity would allow.

Profitability Improvement: By implementing more efficient review models, boutique firms typically see significant improvements in profitability. The combination of reduced costs and the ability to take on larger matters creates substantial financial upside.

“We’re no longer forced to turn away complex matters because of document volume,” explains a boutique firm partner. “Our transformed review capabilities mean we can say ‘yes’ to opportunities that would have been impossible for us just a few years ago.”

Key Elements Across All Transformation Frameworks

While each organization type follows a different path, several common elements emerge across all successful transformations:

Phased Implementation

Successful transformations are rarely all-or-nothing endeavors. Organizations that achieve the best results take a phased approach that allows them to:

• Build internal expertise gradually
• Demonstrate ROI at each stage
• Adjust their approach based on early results
• Maintain service continuity during the transition

This iterative approach reduces risk while building momentum through early successes.

Technology as Enabler, Not Solution

While technology is a critical component of transformation, it’s never the complete solution. Organizations that achieve the best results pair technology with:

• Standardized processes and workflows
• Training and knowledge management
• Performance measurement systems
• Relationship development with high-performing reviewers

The most successful implementations view technology as an enabler of human expertise rather than a replacement for it.

Tailored Approach to Different Matter Types

No organization adopts a one-size-fits-all approach to document review. The most successful develop different strategies for:

• Routine vs. specialized reviews
• Small vs. large-scale matters
• Standard vs. expedited timelines
• Different practice areas and matter types

This tailored approach maximizes efficiency while ensuring appropriate handling of each matter’s unique requirements.

Continuous Improvement Mindset

Finally, successful organizations view transformation as an ongoing journey rather than a one-time project. They:

• Continuously refine their approach based on results
• Increase their independence over time
• Maintain flexibility to adapt to changing needs
• Invest in ongoing improvements to their processes

This continuous improvement mindset ensures that the transformation delivers long-term value rather than a temporary fix.

Your Document Review Transformation Journey

As these frameworks demonstrate, there’s no single “right way” to transform document review. The optimal approach depends on your organization’s specific challenges, resources, and strategic objectives.

Whether you’re a global law firm seeking greater efficiency, a corporate legal department building strategic independence, or a boutique firm looking to compete above your weight class, the key is to start with a clear vision of your goals and implement changes in manageable phases.

In our final post in this series, we’ll provide a practical roadmap for beginning your own document review transformation, including assessment tools and implementation strategies.

If you’re attending Legal Week 2025, we invite you to schedule a personalized conversation. We’ll discuss your specific challenges and objectives and help you develop a tailored approach to transforming your document review operations.

---

This is the third installment in our four-part series exploring the transformation of legal document review. Read Part 1: Transforming Your Greatest Cost Center into a Strategic Asset and Part 2: The Technology Powering Document Review’s Evolution, and stay tuned for our final installment: “Your Roadmap to Document Review Transformation: Next Steps for Success.”

From Burden to Breakthrough: Reimagining Document Review

Part 1: Transforming Your Greatest Cost Center into a Strategic Asset

“I need 20 reviewers by Monday.”

These six words have struck fear into the hearts of legal operations professionals for decades. What follows is all too familiar: frantic calls to staffing agencies, days of waiting for candidates, staggering markups, and the gnawing uncertainty about quality and consistency.

As Legal Week 2025 approaches, it’s time to ask a radical question: What if document review could become your competitive advantage rather than your biggest headache?

When “The Way It’s Always Been Done” No Longer Works

Picture this scenario: It’s Thursday afternoon when a critical matter lands on your desk. The court has set an aggressive discovery timeline. Your outside counsel estimates you’ll need at least 15 reviewers working through the weekend.

The traditional approach unfolds like a painful script we all know by heart:

• The urgent calls begin: You contact multiple staffing agencies, each promising quick results
• The waiting game: Days pass as candidates are sourced and credentials are manually verified
• The budget blow: You receive proposals with 40-60% markups on hourly rates
• The quality gamble: You have limited visibility into reviewer qualifications or past performance
• The inevitable delays: Monday morning arrives with only a portion of your team in place

According to industry data, the average time to fill temporary legal positions is approximately 6 days. For time-sensitive matters, this delay isn’t just inconvenient—it can be consequential for case outcomes and client relationships.

“We were consistently starting our reviews 3-5 days later than needed,” shares the litigation support director at an AmLaw 100 firm. “In high-stakes matters, that lost time was creating real downstream pressure on our attorneys and damaging our client relationships.”

The Technology Inflection Point

The good news? We’re experiencing a fundamental transformation in how document review can be sourced, managed, and optimized.

The emergence of specialized legal staffing platforms has compressed what once took days into minutes:

• Credential verification: Bar status and jurisdictional requirements confirmed instantly
• Reviewer deployment: Qualified reviewers sourced and confirmed in an average of 2.5 minutes
• Performance tracking: Real-time productivity and quality metrics available throughout the review
• Direct compensation: Elimination of traditional markups, reducing costs by 25-40%

This isn’t incremental improvement—it’s a paradigm shift that transforms document review from a necessary evil into a potential strategic advantage.

From Cost Center to Competitive Edge

Forward-thinking legal departments are leveraging these technological advances to reimagine document review in four powerful ways:

1. Cost as Opportunity, Not Just Expense

By eliminating traditional staffing markups and improving process efficiency, organizations aren’t just saving money—they’re creating new possibilities.

A corporate legal department we work with reduced annual document review costs by 37%. Instead of simply returning those savings to the corporate budget, they reinvested in expanding their investigation capabilities, turning a cost-cutting exercise into a strategic expansion of their legal function.

2. Speed as Leverage

When reviewers can be deployed in minutes rather than days, legal teams gain a significant advantage in time-sensitive matters:

“We were able to begin review within hours of receiving a second request in an acquisition context,” notes the general counsel of a technology company. “That speed allowed us to identify potential issues early and adjust our negotiation strategy accordingly. Document review actually became a strategic input rather than just a compliance exercise.”

3. Quality Through Visibility

Real-time metrics on reviewer accuracy, consistency, and productivity are transforming quality control:

• Identifying top performers for future projects
• Addressing quality concerns before they impact outcomes
• Ensuring consistency across large review teams
• Creating defensible, documented review processes

“We’ve built a preferred team of reviewers who understand our business and documents,” explains a litigation counsel at a financial services firm. “Their familiarity with our industry terminology and documents has improved accuracy while reducing the time our attorneys spend providing guidance.”

4. Knowledge as an Asset

Rather than starting from scratch with each new matter, progressive legal departments are building institutional knowledge:

• Creating proprietary databases of qualified reviewers
• Tracking subject matter expertise for specialized reviews
• Maintaining relationships with high-performing reviewers
• Developing standardized workflows for common review types

Finding Your Place on the Independence Spectrum

Not every organization has the same goals or capabilities. We’re seeing legal departments position themselves along what we call the “independence spectrum”:

• Full-Service Management: Some organizations prefer to outsource the entire review process to experts who handle everything from staffing to quality control.
• Hybrid Approach: Others maintain control over key decisions like reviewer selection while outsourcing administrative functions.
• Complete Independence: The most advanced departments build fully independent review operations, maintaining their own reviewer databases and managing the entire process in-house.

There’s no one-size-fits-all solution. The right approach depends on your organization’s volume of review projects, internal resources, and strategic goals.

The Journey Forward

As we approach Legal Week 2025, the question isn’t whether document review will transform, but how quickly legal departments will adapt to the new possibilities.

In our next article, we’ll explore how leading organizations are building their document review independence roadmap—creating a strategic plan to move from traditional staffing dependencies toward greater control, efficiency, and quality.

This is the first installment in our four-part series exploring the transformation of legal document review. Stay tuned for Part 2: “Building Your Document Review Independence Roadmap.”